You can put off making a selection on the best 360 evaluation technologies for a long time, but what does that really achieve? It’s just a timewasting tactic that buys a small amount and may cost a lot. The smarter approach is to meticulously scrutinise your options and single out the one that has the most advantages going for it.

There is no evidence to specify the ideal number of 360 degree raters, however consultants usually suggest between four and ten. A minimum number of raters should be set to maintain anonymity: if there are too few they may be identified by the recipient. What is of greater importance is who the raters are. Those who interact most frequently with the employee undertaking a survey will be able to give meaningful feedback on them. Feedback is important because it both directs employees’ attention to learning and development, and supports motivation by helping them to see their progress towards goals. So it’s important that feedback is given regularly. Many organisations are moving towards more continuous feedback, rather than relying on annual or six-monthly reviews, which is a positive change. The 360 degree feedbackprocess is not new. Yet 360 degree feedbackis new for many people in all types of industries who are evaluating and implementing multisource assessment processes for the first time. They recognize the potential power of the approach in increasing accuracy and fairness of performance feedback and appraisal. Consider the introduction to your organisation's 360 degree feedbackand get clear what the key messages are. This can usefully be signed off by senior stakeholders. You may want to include a quote or signature from a champion or sponsor. Describe the process of 360 degree feedback, and the objectives, and clarify any rating scale that is used as well as what will follow. A benefit of 360 degree feedbackis that results are documented. The report is relevant and clear. Therefore, even when a supervisor provides no additional feedback or coaching, the employee has quality performance information from 360 degree feedback. In some organizations, the skill set that is measured by the 360 process is embedded in the performance appraisal process. The practice of using 360-degree feedback for appraisal remains very controversial.



Different respondents are going to use the 360 degree scale differently. One evaluation panel should rate all people in each area. Evaluation panels, with one evaluation team for everyone, are used by some organizations and in special circumstances, such as extremely technical jobs where expert knowledge is needed to evaluate competencies. Evaluation committees are also common in small groups like departments at universities. Supervisory appraisals are generally time-consuming, and typically both those who give them and those who receive them dislike them. Moreover, they usually don't work; they neither differentiate levels of performance nor motivate employees to improve performance. Supervisors tend to dislike appraisals so much they often avoid doing them completely or put them off as long as possible. 360 degree feedbackrecipients need to understand the feedback and know how to work on it. On the other hand, givers need to learn to give feedback constructively. These are not easy skills to master, however, the results are something worth working towards. A common problem that can be found with performance appraisals is that its downward feedback nature sometimes feel pointless. Being obliged to give a performance appraisal, managers that have little idea of what was actually happening while the work is being done fall into the trap of providing unnatural advice and belated compliments. Looking into 360 degree feedback can be a time consuming process.

A Broad-brush Understanding

The arguments for using 360-degree feedback for evaluation are that (1) the appraisal process should be just as comprehensive as the development process and that (2) individuals should be rewarded for having skills that the organization values, as seen from multiple perspectives. Proponents for using 360-degree feedback for appraisal believe that the data are only useful if they are shared with the supervisor and if they end in a development plan that is tied to results, as well as to subsequent organizational rewards and punishments. Safeguard reports, created by well-designed software, can provide in-depth information about the process. Safeguards indicate immediately if a 360 degree feedbackproject is not effective because respondent behaviors show what people thought about the process. For example, in a successful project, the item (survey question) response rate is highgreater than 85 percentwhich means most people responded to most items. When users do not support a multisource process, response rates will be low. Despite technological leaps in data collection and reporting, introducing a new kind of feedback system can be labor-intensive for any organization. But if you have the basics right and choose the right feedback tool, the success rate of the new system tends to get higher. Let your participants take control of the 360 process while you maintain the integrity of the structures, and the core content and hold the intention. The more control they take, the more genuine value they will get. Be brave and let go – just like you might let your teenager have some freedom. Not trusting them to come home will probably mean they end up in your sight but it may also lead directly to their rebellion and upset as well as stopping them from learning and experiencing for themselves. Employees must understand the objective of 360-degree feedback, the importance of it, and the overall expectations during the process. There should also be some guidelines on confidentiality, how the data will be used, and what behaviors will be rated. Proper education and training on how to give and receive feedback should be given to help keep employees aligned. Making sense of 360 degree feedback system eventually allows for personal and organisational performance development.

The great debate seems to be whether to use 360 degree feedbackfor performance management. It has often been said that an organization's greatest assets are its people. From a developmental and learning perspective, people are its only assets. This being the case, determination of the organization's development and ongoing sustainability rests in the individual and collective learning of its members. From a resource standpoint, if individual and group development plans do not support the organization's development needs, this represents a serious lack of human-capital utilization that could weaken the organization. Confidentiality and anonymity are often confused, although they are both significant issues in a 360-degree process. Confidentiality refers to the limitations placed on how a target manager's data are shared, whereas anonymity refers to the extent to which a rater's identity is revealed. Although ensuring that adequate safeguards are applied is critical to both confidentiality and anonymity, in most 360-degree processes both confidentiality and anonymity have limits, and these need to be made clear to participants in the process. A 360-degree feedback project on any level gathers a lot of data that has to be analyzed and translated into lucid terms in the form of a report. The final report delivered to a working individual is the most important part of getting the best out of the 360-degree feedback process. About 8-12 people fill out the 360 degree survey for one employee, which could be the employee’s manager, colleagues, direct reporters and even customers. The employee also fills the same survey for themselves as a practice of self-assessment and are able to gauge their performance across different benchmarks to understand where they lack. The survey contains questions that can be answered using a rating scale and asks for additional comments where necessary. Organisations should avoid fear based responses when coming to terms with 360 appraisal in the workplace.

Analysis And Decision Making

Typically, in a validity study for a 360-degree feedback leadership instrument we need to establish that scores on the scales have been shown to be related to independent assessments of performance or effectiveness as a manager or leader, because the inference underlying the use of these tools is usually that higher scores are better scores (that is, people with higher scores are better leaders or higher performers). A multi-rater appraisal, such as the 360 degree review, is an excellent method to address a variety of competencies through an analytical lens, including measuring factors that are otherwise difficult to quantify, such as teamwork, leadership abilities and communication skills. Running 360 reviews takes up a significant amount of time, both for human resources and employees. It takes time to plan, design and implement the process from an HR perspective. It also takes employees time to fill out the surveys, especially if they are asked to give feedback for several of their colleagues. Supervisors and the HR team then need to sift through all the data and use it meaningfully. When a 360 degree feedbackprocess has been in use for several years and people trust the results, then the 360 degree feedbackmeasures are useful as one facet of the retention decision process. However, multisource systems are not likely to be the primary element of these types of decision processes because those who provide feedback do so voluntarily. Organizations that adopt 360 degree feedbackwant better performance information and seek to motivate behavior change. They may have other purposes in mind too: to support a cultural change, reinforce team behaviors, or implement strategic initiatives, such as total quality management. People need to feel in control of their destiny - that is why a clear understanding of 360 feedback software is important to any forward thinking organisation.

Make no mistake, the questions asked and the way their answers are organized in the 360 degree process make all the difference between accessible feedback that is actionable and feedback that is dull and devoid of useful content. 360-degree feedback provides comprehensive information about organization training needs and thus allows planning for classes, online learning, cross-functional responsibilities, and cross-training. Some people can be very negative about others in a 360 degree process and can hold on to damning opinions with great determination and significant impact on themselves and others around them. Some cultures seem to allow these attitudes to prevail, others do not give them any space. Once again, they are very challenging to deal with. Open conversations and tough mediation and coaching can make a difference though. Supporting the individual in being OK with others’ negative opinions is the usual strategy. 360 degree feedbackshould be designed especially for each layer/area of the organisation so a CEO should probably have a process designed solely for them with the input of the key board members. A top person going through 360 degree feedbackthat is not totally relevant or inspiring to them is not necessarily going to help your cause. A great feature of 360 degree surveys within the process is that you can send them out for employees to complete in-between tasks. This is instead of interrupting them, perhaps during a business critical operation, to answer a few questions. You might have to nudge a few of them to ensure you get responses, but it’s quicker to do that and less disruptive to productivity. Developing the leadership pipeline with regard to what is 360 degree feedback helps clarify key organisational messages.

The 360 Degree Feedback Process

360-degree feedback is one of the best methods for understanding personal and organizational developmental needs in your organization. You may discover what keeps employees from working successfully together and how your organization's policies, procedures, and approaches affect employee success. In many organizations that use 360-degree feedback, the focus has switched to identifying strengths. That makes sense for employee performance development. The feedback forms for 360 degree feedbackinclude questions that are measured on a rating scale and also ask raters to provide written comments. The person receiving feedback also fills out a self-rating survey that includes the same survey questions that others receive in their forms. Most organizations with 360 degree feedbackuse it primarily for employee development rather than to support appraisal and pay decisions. In this use, the behavior feedback goes only to the subject. When the supervisor sees the behavior feedback, it impacts the supervisor's perception of the employee's performance. Knowledge of how a person is seen by others may have significant positive or negative impact, especially when such information comes from credible work associates. Hence, the 360 degree feedbackbecomes part of the performance management process. Check out extra facts about 360 evaluation technologies on this NHS link.

Related Articles:

Supplementary Findings With Regard To 360 degree assessment software systems
More Information With Regard To 360-Degree review expectations
Supplementary Insight About 360-Degree assessment systems
Additional Insight On 360-Degree evaluation tools
More Background Information About 360 degree feedback instruments
Background Insight About 360 degree assessment systems
More Background Findings With Regard To 360-Degree assessment technologies